False Calendar of Mar Joseph Metropolitan of Marthoma Church

Written By: on Aug 12th, 2010 and filed under Columns, Features, Opinions.

The recent common circular of H.G. Joseph Marthoma Metropolitan, Head of Malankara Marthoma Church has brought out a controversy. The sum and substance of the circular is the statement that H.G. Palakkunnathu Abraham Malpan celebrated Holy Qurbana on 15th August 1835, by reciting the prayers like the Promiyon and Sedra in Malayalam, while holding and watching the Liturgy in Syriac and the 175th anniversary of the event would be celebrated on 15th Aug 2010. In short the entire circular is the compilation of wrong entries, especially in regard to the actual dates.

First of all the date, 15th August 1935, on which date it is mentioned that Palakkunnath Abraham Malpan had celebrated Holy Qurbana and recited the Promion and Sedra in Malayalam is absolutely wrong. The CMS Missionary council held on 22nd March 1836 had entrusted four priests including Palakkunnath Abraham Malpan to introduce the reformation in the liturgy, by paying salary after their utter defeat at the Mavelikkara Synod on 5th Makaram 1836. When slight alterations were introduced in the liturgy by the four priests, which was later known as Half Qurbana (Ara Kurbana in Malayalam), two of them disagreed to celebrate the Holy Qurbana on the basis of the reformed Liturgy.

According to the records available Palakkunnathu Abraham Malpan celebrated the Holy Qurbana at Maramon Church using the Half Qurbana Liturgy on which date the 15 days Lent of the year 1836 concluded. The revised liturgy was not ready as on 15th August 1835, as claimed by H.G. Joseph Marthoma Metropolitan. Secondly the date 15th August 1935 is also wrong. Malankara Orthodox Church accepted the Gregorian calendar on 14th May 1953, the day on which the Church observed the feast of Ascension of Lord Jesus of the year. Until then the 15 days’ Lent used to conclude on 15th Chingam. (A month in Malayalam calendar)

It is clearly mentioned in the Marthoma Church history published in 1936 by Mr. T.C. Chacko that the abovementioned incident took place on 15th Chingam 1012 (1836) The Marthoma Church commemorated the centenary of the reformation in 1936. All these evidences prove that the statement of H.G. Joseph Marthoma Metropolitan is baseless.

Another interesting and funny thing is the statement that the 175th anniversary celebrations would be on 15th August 2010, the feast of the 15 days Lent. When did the Marthoma Church start the celebration of the feast after the Lent, as the Marthoma Church has totally denied the Lent?

The next topic is Palakkunnathu Abraham Malpan and the Malayalam translation. In the book ‘Lamentations’ (Vilaapangal) published by Rev. Thazhathu Chacko Chandapillai who has served a long period as private Secretary to H.G. Palakkunnath Mathews Mar Athanasios Metropolitan as well as a joint Trustee, that the Liturgy modified by Abraham Malpan was in Syriac language. So also there is a mention to the effect in the Order of Holy Qurbana (Qurbaana Kramam) of the Malankara Syrian Marthomites published by the Liturgy reformation committee.

T.C. Chacko has clearly mentioned that Abraham Malpan used the prayers in Syriac language for the private prayers and all those of the public function in Malayalam. In that case what is the reason for limiting just to the Promiyon and Sedra? From where did he gather the information?

Even if the statement that Abraham Malpan recited the Promiyon and Sedra in 1936 in Malayalam for the argument sake, how great was the translation done by Konatt Abraham Malpan Ist in 1820? In 1820 he translated the daily prayer including the Ten Commandments for the ordinary faithful and the portions to be recited by the altar assistant as well as the participating faithful into Malayalam and compiled them as book. And the same book was in use in the Churches across Malankara. More than half of the sayings (responses to the celebrant) are to be recited mostly by the lay participants including the altar assistants. There is no record to prove that Palakkunnathu Malpan had attempted for a translation which might attract a great number of faithful to the worship. So far the Marthoma Church has not attempted in claiming so. If so how the half Qurbana celebrated by Palakkunnathu Malpan could be interpreted as the beginning of the reformation in Malankara Church?

The prayer book of 1920 is a clear evidence of the fact that Konatt Abraham Malpan was a genius of progressive ideas other than the accusation of the British Missionaries that he was a conservative. With this accusation only the British Missionaries had sent out Abraham Malpan Konatt from the Seminary. Konatt Abraham Malpan used “My father you please bless” (Ente Achaa nee vazhthaname) in the place of ‘Barekmor’ of these days. (For more details please see the article ‘Our Lord ….(Njangalkkulla Karthave..)that covers 190 years)

If someone has altered the liturgy, after accepting the monthly salary from the British Missionaries, no one would name it as service to the Church. Especially when the meeting of the Parish representatives, the authoritative body of the Church in taking apt and ideal decisions in regard to the spiritual, secular, worship and administrative matters (assembled at Mavelikkara in 1818 and 1835) denied the suggestions of the reformations. As and when they introduced the one sided decisions, they proved the indiscipline of those people only. Actually the honor for introducing the revolution of translations into Malayalam is to be vested with Kayamkulam Philipose Ramban, who did the translation of the Holy Gospels in accordance with the lectionary of the Holy Church and the Holy Church started using the same since 1811. This is the first literary translation of worship in Malayalam. Palakkunnathu Malpan also might have made use of this book but Mar Joseph Metropolitan has brought out darkness over the fact.

As and when we might evaluate the historical facts of this circular, we could find heaps of baseless anti truth statements. Mar Joseph Metropolitan has mixed up events together and has presented as one like the embracement of Rev. Fr. George Mathen with the Anglican Church, the consecration of Palakkunnath Rev. Dn. Mathews as Bishop from Antioch and denial of ordination to the disciples of Palakkunnath Abraham Malpan. In fact all these incidents are not interconnected. The matter which was discussed once in detail by Messrs. P. Cherian, P. A. Oommen and Z.M. Parett is not repeated here. The Roman Catholics attributed the name ‘Jacobites’ to the Malankara Nazranies by the end of the 17th century. The Catholics named the Malankara St. Thomas Christians as Jaobites as and when the participants of the Coonan Cross oath remained together keeping aloof from the Catholicism. In the version of Catholics the ones who remained away from them had accepted the new Jacobite faith. Varappuzha Metropolitan wrote to Rome that the Jacobites have no authority over the Churches in Malankara due to this reason and this is the first time of addressing us as Jacobites. Later this name got prominence in the Government records as well as public use.

The Patriarchs of Antioch had claimed spiritual supremacy over Malankara from the early decades of the 18th century and at least from the time of Marthoma V, Malankara Metropolitan. Mainly they insisted for the authority of consecrating the Metropolitans and entrusting the Stathikon (document of authority) to the Malankara Metropolitan. Pakalomattam Marthoma Metropolitans as well as H.G, Cheppad Mar Dionysius did not agree to those claims. Palakkunnathu Mathews Mar Athanasios is the first one to agree with the claim.

Palakkunnath Mathews Mar Athanasios is the first Malankara Nazrani to reach Marddin to accept consecration from the Patriarch of Antioch in 1842. When he claimed the authority of the throne of Malankara Metropolitan before the local Government authorities, he upheld the credit that he was consecrated by the Patriarch of Antioch. It is true that as and when he got recognition of being the Malankara Metropolitan, the supremacy of Patriarch over Malankara came into existence for the first time in history. As a result the power of Malankara Association to elect the Metropolitans and to take decisions to consecrate them became null and void.

As and when H.G. Joseph Mar Dionysius V accepted consecration from the Patriarch of Antioch and claimed for the authority over the throne, Palakkunnath Mathews Mar Athanasios changed his stand. When the Patriarch of Antioch paid a visit to Kerala in 1876, Palakkunnath Mathews Mar Athanasios denied his allegiance to the Patriarch. The consecration of Palakkunnath Thomas Mar Athanasios as his successor was one sided and without the cooperation of Patriarch. H.G. Joseph Mar Dionysius V convened a fresh meeting of the representatives of Parishes of the Church at Parumala in 1873 with an intention of reviving the Association which lost its frame work and rules and regulations due to the arrival of Palakkunnath Mathews Mar Athanasios as Malanakara Metropolitan. H.G. Joseph Mar Dionysius could re-instate the Malankara Syrian Christian Association and to elect the Managing Committee. But there was a legal problem as the Malankara Metropolitan in power only could do so and the legal rights vested with Palakkunnath Mar Athanasios Metropolitan. Hence the decisions of the meeting remained ineffective.

H.G. Joseph Mar Dionysius V invited H.H. the Patriarch to Kerala in 1876 in the light of these circumstances. Until that time Palakkunnath Mathews Mar Athanasios had never denied the authority of the Patriarch publicly. His earlier claims for the position did not allow him to publicize his denial in those days. Mar Dionysius attempted so with the firm faith that the dissident leader would not question the legality of the Association convened by the superior whom the dissident leader also accepted with due respects.

The attempt not only succeeded but also the meeting of the Parish representatives held at Mulanthuruthy in 1876 re-approved the decisions of the Parumala Association held in 1873. The meeting formed the legal Association and elected Mar Dionysius as its President. Hence Mar Dionysius got the honor of being elected by the people which was unavoidable for the Malankara Metropolitan.

Nothing more happened in the Mulanthuruthy Association. As mentioned above, the Malankara Church had the name ‘Jacobite’ since the end of the 17th century. In those days no body had thought about the name ‘Marthoma Church’. In the first decades of the 20th Century an application was submitted to the Travancore Government officials and got the name “Marthoma Church” approved. A partition took place in the Church only when H.G. Joseph Mar Dionysius V got victory in the Royal Court judgment of 1889. It could be easily proved that H.G. Mar Dionysius or his followers did not intend or think to bring in a partition in the Church in 1889 or in 1876 or later. The first decision of the Parumala meeting of the Church representatives was to try for an amicable settlement with the dissidents. It is a truth that H.G. Mar Dionysius had expressed to relinquish his position for the sake of peace and harmony with H.G. Mathews Mar Athanasios during the peace talks initiated by King of Travancore soon after the Royal Court judgment of 1889. But unfortunately H.G. Mathews Mar Athanasios remained adamant on his stand without a mind of reconciliation.

It is true that from the day on which H.G. Palakkunnath Mathews Mar Athanasios took over the Malankara Metropolitan’s office, there were two groups in the Church. And it was a practice in the Church to have a rival group against the local Metropolitan in power. There must be solid reasons on the basis of the local and personal grounds. This is the picture of the facts provided by the Church history and there were no other reasons for having two groups at the time of Mar Athanasios of Palakkunnath.

The claim of the Marthoma Church and the accusation of the opponent group of those days that Mar Mathews Athanasios introduced the reformation in the Church is an important topic to be studied with deserving seriousness. Rev. Chacko Chandapillai, who had served as the private secretary to H.G. Mar Athanasios Palakkunnath provides a number of hints to the effect that there was no introduction of the reformation.

The court case that had ended with the Royal Court judgment of 1889 was re-opened only after the demise of Mar Mathews Palakkunnathu Thirumeni. Each group argued for the power of the entire Church and a partial success was not the intention. H.G. Thomas Mar Athanasios and his followers formed the Reformed Syrian Church when His Grace had to return the official rod and crown, isolating them from the Mother Church followed by the failure in the court case.

Now let us think about the statement that the Malankara Orthodox Church was established in 1912. As mentioned above, the claim that the Metropolitans are to be consecrated by the Patriarch, got influence in Malankara since the consecration of Palakkunnath Mathews Mar Athanasios, who was consecrated by the Patriarch. It became mandatory in the Royal court judgment of 1899. Patriarch of Antioch only consecrated H.G. Vattasseril Joseph Mar Dionysius in 1908. In 1912 the Patriarch of Antioch of those days elevated a Metropolitan as Catholicose of the East and transferred the powers enjoyed by Patriarch to the new Catholicose. (Especially to consecrate the Malankara Metropolitan and other Metropolitans) It was not the formation of a new Church or a change of the systems that existed till then. Before this incident, two Metropolitans (H.G. Julius Mar Alvaris and H.G. Rene Vilathi Mar Themothios) were consecrated by the Metropolitans of Malankara jointly with the permission of the Patriarch. The Catholicate in Malankara is the net result of the kind gesture of the Patriarch, giving permanent arrangement after giving approval for the timely developments. As and when the Catholicate was established, there did not take place any change or limitations to the power of the Malankara Metropolitan. In other words what was submitted to H.G. Mar Mathews Athanasios in 1842 has been taken back and re-scheduled with the Catholicose in 1912.

The Church in Malankara had not accepted the title name “Orthodox’ in those days. Catholicate was established when the Church was known as Jacobite Church. The Church officially accepted the name ‘Orthodox’ when the constitution of the Church was accepted in 1934. It is clearly mentioned in the 3rd clause of the Constitution that the Church is also known as Jacobite Church, its real and original name is ‘Orthodox Syrian Church’. It is specifically mentioned so and it doesn’t mean that it is not due to the establishment of a new Church. As the position of Malankara Metropolitan is there in the Constitution as it was there since its inception, no one could say that it was due to the formation of a new church. In the Church knowledge, ‘Orthodox’ stands for right and straight faith. The name of the church headed by the Patriarch of Antioch is also ‘Orthodox’.

It is an interesting truth that the Malankara Church has the name ‘Orthodox’ at least from the end of the 17th century, when the Church was named ‘Jacobite’. H.G. Mar Ivanios Hidayathallah’s common circular (order) of 1686 starts with the saying, “of Indian orthodox Syrians…” The head line of the prayer book translated and published by Konatt Abraham Malpan is: “of Orthodox Jacobite Syrian Christian’s….”

In fact the faction of the Church which adopted the name “Reformed Church” immediately after the Royal Court Judgment of 1899 formed the new Church and it was named Marthoma Syrian Church in 1911. The Marthoma Church cannot claim or inherit the heritage of the Malankara Orthodox Church in view of the historical, doctrinal or legal grounds.

Malankara Orthodox Church would be celebrating the centenary of the establishment of its Catholicate in India. It might be the need of the Marthoma Church and its head H.G. Joseph Metropolitan to organize a celebration program. But the means for this should not to ridicule the mother Church or should not try to present wrong information against the historical facts.

This article is translated from Malayalam by Jose Kurien Puliyeril

Click For More Articles By:

Readers are welcome to leave their thoughts and reflections below by posting a comment on this topic.
(6 votes, average: 3.17 out of 5)

Email This Post Email This Post

Print This Post Print This Post

Disclaimer: Indian Orthodox Herald does not moderate or edit the comments posted in this column. All opinions are solely of the writers and IOH holds no responsibility what so ever for the views written here below.

23 Responses for “False Calendar of Mar Joseph Metropolitan of Marthoma Church”

  1. Mandooran says:

    The date should be correct as the Metropolitan perhaps was speaking about the liturgy revised by the Malpan himself and used in the Maramon Church against the warnings of the then Malankara Metran . The committees and ratifications were later events and cannot serve an evidence to disprove the dates

  2. This article covers most of the truth especially, when it comes to place marthomites and their position in history. The fact that everyone disregards is that – If a father has two sons – and one choose a position and the other a different one, does that mean they are not brothers and of the same parental roots.
    Everything rooted from the incompetent/weakened stands of Punnathra Mar Dionysius, and nobody can disregard the fact that Abraham Malpan didn’t influence the strong rifts in Malankara Church and same is the case with Geevarghese Mar Dionysius of Vattasseril (His bishop-ship was also cancelled during the birth of Orthodox Church), he is the sole mastermind in creating what is today known as the Independent Orthhodox Syrian Church and Catholicos of the East (Brilliant and tactical move with Patriarch Ignatius Abdul Masih II ) and its uprooting from the Jacobite territory, by claiming its spiritual roots still with the Jacobite Patriarch and playing around with words like Orthodox and Jacobite for monetary stronghold and to affirm his reign. His play in keeping the fight and identity with independence from its parent church through rallying up was the deception that was successfully employed at those critical period of Christian history, nothing came automatically as funnily and polished in the article, there is nothing wrong in owning the truth as it is.
    True is the fact that H.G. Mar Mathews Athanasios obtained his bishop-ship for the cause of reformative ideologies rooted from his Uncle from his childhood and that to without the consent of the then Malankara Church Elders with the help of his Elite friends of his alma-mater. He didn’t inform the true state of the church in kerala or of his motives at Antioch, there was a coerced effort followed with this event. All this started with the lack of firm leadership abilities by Mar Dionysius IV in overseeing the issues of the church and grooming a successor, But Pulikkottil Joseph Mar Dionysious II is the true leader of Malankara Orthodox Church who fought back against these coercions with faith and was to able to retain the church’s identity free from the western ideologies influence.
    One other fact about the new marthomites as mentioned in the article is that they are not very inclined in adamantly claiming somethings as their somethings, but to bring changes in their way of christian life and what they consider beneficial to their laity in spiritual nurturing is their business, if they celebrate lent, let them and I don’t see what that should incite any.

  3. Mathew says:

    I recognize with Fr George Abraham statement, in why bother on this silly issues and as i hear they are running with a load of issues with their bishops(they are only stating bishop theophilos as a better option, not as the best one and ones celebrated bishop chrysostom is like a loose canon now, due to senility and other theological aspects) and of how should christians act as Fr. Joy Pyngolil states and as nesor says Pulikkottil Joseph Mar Dionysious II is often forgotten or subsided leader of the church, One fact is that H.G. Mar Mathews Athanasios is still considered as a metropolitan in the orthodox church history for a brief, even if it is dismayed by my orthodox laity, a vivid picture of the bishop is kept in Parumala church, that itself shows the church’s greater understanding than that of its followers petty fights from aloof and misguided understandings.

  4. John says:

    How do you expect the common people of OC to follow Christ when you have priests like Fr.George Abraham ? His comments clearly suggests us that just by taking a graduation in Theology (and getting beatings from Kerala police) will not make a respected priest but should get blessings from above..!

  5. David Mathew says:

    The history repeats, No one run away from history. The religious harmony must maintain in the name of christian vales. When we read old Testament, It is clearly mentioned, What is the Church. The new Testament is the continuation of old testament.The new Israel has been formed by the Holy blood of His son. When the people questions about trinity, St.Mary, Departed souls, those questioners can not form a church, by the back up support of colonial Kings. Still this is happening word wide, there is only one church, we believe the true Orthodoxy with our “Viswasa Pramanam” Catholikam and Aposthoilikam , English is only language of 26 alphabet, beyond Malayalam is better and powerful with Sanskirt words.

  6. Rev Mathews says:

    Let us continue to do the work that has been entrusted to us by the Lord.. facts and figures, dates and years, denominations and divisions – none of these are going to help you once your spirit had departed your body.

    Satan has given enough tools into the church today to cause strife and division, so also to waste some productive time..

    Accept the acceptables and respect the unacceptables, but hold to the truth – that Jesus is the way..


  7. john mathew says:

    why cant’ you people forgive and forget be united in God’s love. why fight for churches and its properties. If the lectionery / rituals everything is same, why fight on the streets for properties. not allowing the dead for a peaceful burial. this is very shameful.

  8. john mathew says:

    to all my dear jacobite / orthodox friends, please stop criticising marthoma metropolitan and see within yourselves and ask your thirumenis achens and people to stop street fights and behave like GOD’s children. Its a shame to all Christians irrespective of divisions that these Thirumenis go on hunger strikes and all sort of gimmicks
    john mathew

  9. Jacob says:

    Dear Brothers,
    Why you are quarrel each other for even small things. Can you stop the dirty politics court cases. Join together in the name of Jesus.

  10. Abraham says:

    @Saji Jacob

    You are a Jacobite, and that is very evident from your words.

    In 1912, ‘Catholicate’ was transferred to Malankara.

    Please understand, what is raising a church to ‘Catholicate’ level .

    India, declared itself a republic in 1950, so did India came into being in 1950 ?

    India, got independence from British in 1947, so did India cease to exist before 1947 ?

    What happened in 1912, is the simple elevation of the ‘bishopric’ of Malankara to ‘Catholic’ status..

    Common sense is not so common among malayalis .. Shame.

  11. Saji Jacob says:

    I agree with Fr. Joy says. We as a Malayalee community always like to criticize and cause friction among communities. It is sad that people are making such rude comments about the Metropolitans calendar and I think it is due to lack of education and ignorance. When did the Orthodox faction come in to existence ?
    Malankara Christians know that there was only one Church and that was called Jacobites and Catholicate came in to existence in 1912. So let’s not falsify history.

  12. Samuel says:

    See this same meni is making partition in Kuwait Marthoma parish.

    ha ha martomakaarum kollatha meni….

  13. Samuel says:

    who is thirumeni…? what is paithrukam..?

    all of us when we pray lords prayer we all say

    “ninte … (god almighty’s) namam …
    ninte… (god almighty’s) rajyam…
    ……… ennekkum nenakku (god almighty’s)

    when we take almighy’s name we say ninte… nenakku…

    but when we take a human leader of our denomination…. we say.. Holy. Rt. Rev. vandiya.. thirumanassu.. thrikan thurannu kandalum … angayoude…

    ha ha ha… cherikkam…. ennallathe enthu parayan…

  14. Nevin Koshy says:

    First of all – the article presented here may be accurate.
    My comments:
    1. Some of the bishops of the Marthoma church have forsaken God’s Word & commandments. They are living like the gentiles. So DONT TRY TO FOLLOW MEN. FOLLOW JESUS who is the ONLY WAY to salvation (Acts 4:12).

    2. “Azhukunna meni ellaam thirumeni alla.” There is only one king and He is in heaven mediating for us. He is coming soon to take His followers home to rule and reign with Him. Get ready for that. Learn the Bible which is the Word of God. Forget about foolish politics. In the end you will stand before God alone – Get ready for that Great day (1 Thess 4:13-18)

  15. Before discussing these controversial matters, let us first think the present position of the oriental churches in Kerala. Surely these type of arguments will try to spoil the good relationship between churches. Instead of fighting for the supremacy,think about the benefit you will get from this . There are many scholars and eminent persons in the society who like to work as a “PAGE” for Thirumeni and others. By making these type of arguments, what they are getting, only God knows. Instead of spending time to create these type of controversial issues, let them try to learn how to love his own brothers.

  16. Alexander says:

    Mar Chrisostom Metrapolitan is the latest reformationist of the Mar Thoma church. He ate ‘aravana’ from Sabarimala forbidden to Christians, he visited Matha Amrithananda and attended Bhajana with her, he visited Aranmula temple to eat ‘Vallasadya’ (food offered to idols), he installed the idol of ‘Sri Krishna’ in his pulatheen … I have more to say, but it will not help. Mar Thoma church, please stop boasting about the reformation that happened once, but go back to the word of God. The reformation is not continuing in the church, so please stop celebrating the anniversary.

  17. Why are we bothering much about the things Joseph Marthoma is writing.
    The Marthomites themselves says he has lost his senses and doing all this to create a subject and so attention be spotted on him.
    The fact is that the MarThoma church was very keen to avoid this person as their MarThoma and wanted to have Suffargon Mar Theophilose Episcopa as the head of the Church and still is praying for the same.
    “Edarcha varrunnathu swavabhikam ennal aarr mukhene idarcha varunnuvoo avan haa kashtam”

    Let us also pray that MAr Theophilose take over the reign as the head of their Church.
    Let this be also a note for our bishops and clergies who are leading the ‘Tea Ecumenisms’.
    Sit down and solve this and if so then go ahead with Ecumenism.

  18. RK says:


    Malayalam was used much before, Marthoma Abaham Malphan created the ‘ara kurbana’.

    The transalations to malayalam was undertaken by KONAT ABRAHAM MALPAN before PALAKUNATHU ABRAHAM MALPHAN cut shorted the kurabana, in alignment to the Anglican Church. He was paid by the Anglican missionaries in doing so.

    ****as mr thomas claims marthoma church is not under any foreign bishops****

    Palakunathu deacon went to Syria, fooled the Patriach, became bishop, and propagated in Kerala that he is the Authorised bishop. That means a cronie of the syrians. He fooled the local christians here, and also the travancore rulers showing the syrian staticon. FIRST HE PLAYED THE SYRIAN CARD

    When the Syrian Patriach himself came to Kerala, he was left with no choice, rather to say, he is alone, and his is an independent church, with no syrian connections. NOW HE PLAYED THE INDIAN CARD.

    Who is the culprit here? One who did all politricks and all cards to be the head of a church or the poor local christians who wanted to remove the British influence on the church?

    Surely we were under the influence of West Syrians, what marthoites did was to bring another BRITISH influence to kerala. Even now you are western styled church with western faith.

  19. Koshy says:

    HG Joseph Marthoma, by issuing such a controversial circular, aims to invite public attention to him. Hitherto, though he become Marthomas Metropolitan, his folks are yet to accept him, becuase people still follow what HG Mar Crystostom says. First he tried to divert attention by celebrating his birthday, which turned to be an utter failure (as mentioned by a Marthomas church member). So he played a second card to draw public attention to him, which I think is effective so far!!

  20. joseph says:

    even when orthodox church claims that marthomaites are the one’s who made the reformation in malankara church it has to be understood that church division was just a second option in front of our bishops and today even orthodox achens are using malayalam in liturgy and as mr thomas claims marthoma church is not under any foreign bishops. it is the orthodox church who is under antiocian bishops and eastern orthodoxy and also the false teachings which crept into the malankara church during the roman catholic invtervention

  21. thomas says:

    It is not a “simple” mistake, but deliberate attack against the Orthodox Church by the british marthoma anglicans.

  22. We live in a land where freedom of press is well recognized. We have so many media to communicate genuine realistic or biased opinions. There is no censoring. Authentic/ethical historical research stays with scholars not with administrator or politicians. The latter groups look only to the areas where they can gain something of use. In 1930, Katherine Mayo published a book ” Mother India” tarnishing India and supporting British raj in India. But Indian free spirit and Satya- graha (knowing/holding the truth) prevailed and today we celebrated India 64th independence day.
    In an ecumenical age, simple mistakes or oversight by a leader or a group of people has to be ignored to maintain good relationship with our sister churches. Let’s ignore the minor things and move with higher ambition for Mission. Our precious resources must be used to expand our joint mission efforts not to attack each other. At the end of “the Day”, history doesn’t matter much.

    Fr. Joy Pyngolil, Florida

Leave a Reply

Advertisement CLICK HERE

Photo Gallery

Log in / © 2002-2009 BMM Creations Inc. All Rights Reserved.