<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Apocryphal Books</title> <atom:link href="http://www.orthodoxherald.com/2010/02/07/apocryphal-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.orthodoxherald.com/2010/02/07/apocryphal-books/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=apocryphal-books</link> <description>Online Christian Publication for Indian Orthodox Malankara Keralite Malayali Christian By BMM Creations Inc.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:39:32 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: John Mathew, Toronto</title><link>http://www.orthodoxherald.com/2010/02/07/apocryphal-books/comment-page-1/#comment-2747</link> <dc:creator>John Mathew, Toronto</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:55:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthodoxherald.com/?p=3495#comment-2747</guid> <description>Should Orthodox priests be referring to the Deuterocanonical (i.e., the &quot;second canon&quot;) books as the &quot;Apocrypha&quot; especially since many Orthodox Churches include these books in their canons?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should Orthodox priests be referring to the Deuterocanonical (i.e., the &#8220;second canon&#8221;) books as the &#8220;Apocrypha&#8221; especially since many Orthodox Churches include these books in their canons?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aramaic Scholar</title><link>http://www.orthodoxherald.com/2010/02/07/apocryphal-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1635</link> <dc:creator>Aramaic Scholar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:58:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.orthodoxherald.com/?p=3495#comment-1635</guid> <description>This is a really great summary of the Apocrypha in the various Bible translations/traditions. I am especially interested in the Aramaic (Syriac) Old Testament or Peshitta Tanakh. Different Aramaic (Syriac) manuscripts have very different traditions over which books of the Apocrypha are included.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really great summary of the Apocrypha in the various Bible translations/traditions. I am especially interested in the Aramaic (Syriac) Old Testament or Peshitta Tanakh. Different Aramaic (Syriac) manuscripts have very different traditions over which books of the Apocrypha are included.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.orthodoxherald.com @ 2012-02-07 12:23:10 by W3 Total Cache -->
