Euphoria Of The Romo Syrians In India Over A Phony Catholicate: Is The Patriarch Of Rome More Trustworthy Than The Patriarch Of Antioch

Written By: on Jun 21st, 2009 and filed under Editorial.


Negotiations with Rome

It is true that the Holy Synod had entrusted Bishop Ivanios with the task of negotiations with an ancient Church because St. Dionysius and the Synod were very much concerned about a defeat in the court of law. If the court decided against the Metropolitan of Malankara, particularly against the Catholicate, in favor of the Patriarch of Antioch, it would permanently damage the credibility and legitimacy of the Catholicate-Patriarchate of the East. In such a situation, the recognition of the Catholicate by another ancient Church was crucial. It was for this purpose that the Holy Synod instructed Bishop Ivanios to look for avenues to establish canonical connection with an ancient Church. The Holy Synod never had the intention of establishing any alliance with Rome, that had destroyed Orthodoxy in the past, and that had many heterodox doctrines.

However, Bishop Ivanios took this opportunity to start negotiations to realize his own dreams for power and wealth. He thought that a less educated episcopate in the Synod would easily follow him and he could be the leader of them. By this time he knew that he would not be the next Catholicos, and this situation urged the ambitious bishop to seek a haven where he could find himself with power and wealth. With his contact of the western churches at Serampore, he knew very well that Rome would be that haven where he would receive a warm welcome and immense wealth to carry on establishing an eastern rite under the Pope. He also dreamed that he could establish an Eastern Rite Catholicate under Rome, and he could be the Catholicos of those following him to Rome.

While negotiations with Rome were secretly progressing he convinced Rome that the Catholicos and the other bishops with their flock would join the Roman Church, while he knew very well that it would never happen. But he knew that that was the only way to impress Rome. During this time he tactfully managed to convince the Holy Synod to consecrate another bishop as his assistant (Jacob Theophilus). A shrewd bishop, Ivanios did this for his own elevation as the Metropolitan of Bethany. Why? This was the only way to impress Rome that he was equal to an Archbishop and he had a suffragan bishop. According to the Roman terminology a metropolitan is an archbishop. He was actually preparing the way for his ascent as an archbishop or a Catholicos in the Roman Church. If he went to Rome without another bishop or without the title of metropolitan, the Pope would not have permitted a hierarchy under him. The Orthodox hierarchy was so naïve or did not have the farsightedness to understand the cunning plans of Ivanios. They trusted him, because it was in him the Church invested all her hopes, as he was the most educated among bishops. The Synod never thought that Ivanios would ever betray her, or deceive his own spiritual father, St. Dionysius, who had loved him more than any other bishops.

It is said by Roman Catholic historians that it was because Ivanios was a man who wanted to keep his promise to Rome that he joined the Roman Church. According to them the Synod of Malankara did keep its promise. The truth is that the Synod never asked Ivanios to start negotiations with Rome for union. Ivanios did it for his own advantage, which the Synod never approved.

Finally, rejecting his mother Church that nourished him in every manner, Ivanios professed the Roman faith in front of Bishop Bensiger of Quilon on September 20, 1930, assuming that the Pope will eventually make him a Catholicos. That dream did not realize. Rome clearly said a Catholicate would not be established under Rome, because the Orthodox Catholicos did not join the Roman Church. This has been the position of Rome that when there is an Orthodox Patriarchate or Catholicate, the Pope would not erect a parallel uniate patriarchate or Catholicate.

Eventually Metropolitan Ivanios was made the Archbishop of Trivandrum, and Bishop Theophilus was made the Bishop of Thiruvalla within the recently established Malankara Syrian Catholic Rite in Keralam. Ivanios really wanted to be a Catholicos, but he did not have the title, but he acted like a patriarch or Catholicos. In 1934, four years after his defection to Rome, he published the anaphoras of St. James the Apostle and St. Xystus of Rome. I am quoting a relevant part from the page of approbation. Here is the Syriac original: “Iyavanis Givargis Panikker Veettil, d’rahmav d’aloho metropulito d ’Trivandrum: bourktho shlihoitho v’shlomomo moranayo l’ahain m’yakre episcope v’labnayin habibe kurepiscope v’kashishe…” (Published by Mar Julius Press, Pampakuda, 1934).


Panikker Veetil Ivanios Givargis,
By the Grace of God
Archbishop of Trivandrum:

Apostolic Benediction and Lordly Peace to our honorable bishops and to our sons the chorbishops and priests!

The phrase “Apostolic Benediction” is used only by patriarchs and catholicoi who are occupants of Apostolic Sees. An ordinary archbishop or bishop does not use this phrase, although they are also successors of apostles. In 1934 Archbishop Ivanios had only one bishop under him, Bishop Theophilus. But the plural indicates that he claims to be the head of a Synod, who is a Catholicos or Patriarch.

The newspapers report that Bishop Isaac Clemis of Thiruvalla (the Uniate Diocese) has said that Archbishop Ivanios would have his most rejoicing moment in heaven at the declaration of conferring the title of Catholicos on his successor at Trivandrum. Let me correct you, bishop: Archbishop Ivanios must have gnashed his teeth in the belly of the Cathedral at Trivandrum, because this was the title he surely wanted to hold, but never had the blessing to hold.

Click For More Articles By:

Readers are welcome to leave their thoughts and reflections below by posting a comment on this topic.
(3 votes, average: 2.33 out of 5)

Email This Post Email This Post

Print This Post Print This Post

Disclaimer: Indian Orthodox Herald does not moderate or edit the comments posted in this column. All opinions are solely of the writers and IOH holds no responsibility what so ever for the views written here below.

6 Responses for “Euphoria Of The Romo Syrians In India Over A Phony Catholicate: Is The Patriarch Of Rome More Trustworthy Than The Patriarch Of Antioch”

  1. geroge varhghese says:

    i dont know why we comment on some issues which we are not aware

  2. james varghese says:

    I am from the new born diocese ahmedabad. we were very much thrilled when we got h.g. mar julius. in his grace’s intial speech he mentioned abt his vision abt this diocese. but like any other bishops of our church his grace is not able to or cannot spend time in the diocese.

    after the birth of this diocese its more than 2years and till today the priests who are serving in this diocese from delhi, calcutta and mumbai are still not getting salary from this ahmedabad diocese they are receving it from the particular diocese from where they have come. tht’s only one example.

    ya his grace have visited almost all the parishes of this diocese,but by this i dont see any rare thing this is usual which is done by most of the bishops. when we enquire abt some information to the diocese headquaters the reply whcih we get is “it will be done” or “we will send it” but nothing happens.

    next month is the enthronement of his grace and many commitees have been formed but thts for name sake the decision taken regarding the said above is made by the so called people from ahmedabad parish. so its a humble request to the bishop and the office bearers to concentrate on the diocese and its function.

    the other new born diocese have started functioning smoothy the reason behind it is that the bishops of the particular diocese is present their. their is one humble suggestion like other diocese why cant they appoint a p.r.o (public relation officer ).

  3. Dn Geevargheese says:

    Excellent. I fully agree.

  4. JG says:

    I’m inclined to agree with the author.

  5. Vilson says:

    Even if Mar Ivanios joined for material benifit or any personnel benifts as achen says one thing we should accept that , the people joined along with him and their new generation are not stucked in cases as we stuck since the begining of the 19th centuary, which is the concern of the common people than how many catholicose are there. I am writing this because i am also from an orthodox family by birth but i could most of the churches functioning power and money centered rather than christ centered (even the protestants).

  6. V.Varghese Mathew, Auckland says:

    We have another Panicker becoming Bishop after Ivanios. Need to watch him cautiously?

Leave a Reply

Advertisement CLICK HERE

Photo Gallery

Log in / © 2002-2009 BMM Creations Inc. All Rights Reserved.